*Is 8: Difference between revisions

From Cives
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Inscription
{{Inscription
|trasnliteration=ob or eṿ
|trasnliteration=ob or eṿ
|object=ceramic jug
|script=Venetic alphabet
|language=Venetic
|direction=sinistroverse
|technique=scratched post cocturam
|condition=fragmentary
|findspot=Gradič above Kobarid
|findspot=Gradič above Kobarid
|context=open-air cult site
|date=1st c. BC
|commentary=<p>A fragment of a bronze plaque made from thin sheet of metal. Otherwise well-preserved, with a dark color, the outer edge of the plaque missing. Three raised bosses have been set in a triangle on the plaque. Under the widest side of the triangle, there are four short stick-shaped bulges, of which the two in the middle form one or more letters. This may be a part of a votive inscription. Dimensions are 4 × 2 cm. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations.</p><p>fragment A: [---]ob[---], fragment B: [---]eṿ[---] (theoretically of course possibly also ''ep'' or eventually, but less likely, if the inscription belongs to the Posočje group, ''el''). Like *Is 6, it is far too fragmentary to be of any real linguistic or graphematic interest.</p>
|bibliography=<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);" >Repanšek, Luka (2022)</span>. Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);" >Repanšek, Luka (2020)</span>. Towards the Interpretation of *Is 7. In: Th. L. Markey, L. Repanšek (eds.), ''Revisiting Dispersions. Celtic and Germanic ca. 400 BC – ca. 400 AD. Procee­dings of the International Interdisciplinary Conference held at Dolenjski muzej, Novo mesto, Slovenia; October 12 th – 14th, 2018'' (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 67). Washington D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man, pp. 162–183.</p>
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:27, 20 April 2024

Transliteration ob or eṿ
Object ceramic jug
Script Venetic alphabet
Language Venetic
Writing direction sinistroverse
Technique scratched post cocturam
Condition fragmentary
Findspot Gradič above Kobarid
Archaeological context open-air cult site
Archaeological culture to be inserted
Date 1st c. BC

Original text

to be inserted


Commentary

A fragment of a bronze plaque made from thin sheet of metal. Otherwise well-preserved, with a dark color, the outer edge of the plaque missing. Three raised bosses have been set in a triangle on the plaque. Under the widest side of the triangle, there are four short stick-shaped bulges, of which the two in the middle form one or more letters. This may be a part of a votive inscription. Dimensions are 4 × 2 cm. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations.

fragment A: [---]ob[---], fragment B: [---]eṿ[---] (theoretically of course possibly also ep or eventually, but less likely, if the inscription belongs to the Posočje group, el). Like *Is 6, it is far too fragmentary to be of any real linguistic or graphematic interest.

Bibliography

Repanšek, Luka (2022). Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615.

Repanšek, Luka (2020). Towards the Interpretation of *Is 7. In: Th. L. Markey, L. Repanšek (eds.), Revisiting Dispersions. Celtic and Germanic ca. 400 BC – ca. 400 AD. Procee­dings of the International Interdisciplinary Conference held at Dolenjski muzej, Novo mesto, Slovenia; October 12 th – 14th, 2018 (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 67). Washington D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man, pp. 162–183.

Image

to be inserted