*Is 8: Difference between revisions
LukaRepansek (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
LukaRepansek (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Inscription | {{Inscription | ||
|trasnliteration= | |trasnliteration=ọb eṿ | ||
|object=ceramic jug | |||
|script=Venetic alphabet | |||
|language=Venetic | |||
|direction=sinistroverse | |||
|technique=scratched post cocturam | |||
|condition=fragmentary | |||
|findspot=Gradič above Kobarid | |findspot=Gradič above Kobarid | ||
|context=open-air cult site | |||
|date=1st c. BC | |||
|commentary=<p>A fragment of a bronze plaque made from thin sheet of metal. Otherwise well-preserved, with a dark color, the outer edge of the plaque missing. Three raised bosses have been set in a triangle on the plaque. Under the widest side of the triangle, there are four short stick-shaped bulges, of which the two in the middle form one or more letters. This may be a part of a votive inscription. Dimensions are 4 × 2 cm. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations.</p> | |||
<p>fragment A: [---]ob[---], fragment B: [---]eṿ[---] (theoretically of course possibly also ''ep'' or eventually, but less likely, if the inscription belongs to the Posočje group, ''el''). Like *Is 6, it is far too fragmentary to be of any real linguistic or graphematic interest.</p> | |||
|bibliography=<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Repanšek, Luka (2022)</span>. Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615.</p> | |||
<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Repanšek, Luka (2020)</span>. Towards the Interpretation of *Is 7. In: Th. L. Markey, L. Repanšek (eds.), ''Revisiting Dispersions. Celtic and Germanic ca. 400 BC – ca. 400 AD. Proceedings of the International Interdisciplinary Conference held at Dolenjski muzej, Novo mesto, Slovenia; October 12 th – 14th, 2018'' (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 67). Washington D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man, pp. 162–183.</p> | |||
|file=Is 8 Risba_Nada Osmuk.jpg | |||
|imageCaption=Drawing: Nada Osmuk © Goriški muzej Nova Gorica | |||
|test=<div id="slikce"><img id="v1" src="venetianLetters/v1.png"><img id="e1" src="venetianLetters/e1.png"><img id="spacebar-letter" src="venetianLetters/spacebar-letter.png"><img id="o3" src="venetianLetters/o3.png"><img id="o1" src="venetianLetters/o1.png"></div> | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 21 April 2024
| Transliteration | ọb eṿ |
|---|---|
| Object | ceramic jug |
| Script | Venetic alphabet |
| Language | Venetic |
| Writing direction | sinistroverse |
| Technique | scratched post cocturam |
| Condition | fragmentary |
| Findspot | Gradič above Kobarid |
| Archaeological context | open-air cult site |
| Archaeological culture | to be inserted |
| Date | 1st c. BC |
Original text
Commentary
A fragment of a bronze plaque made from thin sheet of metal. Otherwise well-preserved, with a dark color, the outer edge of the plaque missing. Three raised bosses have been set in a triangle on the plaque. Under the widest side of the triangle, there are four short stick-shaped bulges, of which the two in the middle form one or more letters. This may be a part of a votive inscription. Dimensions are 4 × 2 cm. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations.
fragment A: [---]ob[---], fragment B: [---]eṿ[---] (theoretically of course possibly also ep or eventually, but less likely, if the inscription belongs to the Posočje group, el). Like *Is 6, it is far too fragmentary to be of any real linguistic or graphematic interest.
Bibliography
Repanšek, Luka (2022). Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615.
Repanšek, Luka (2020). Towards the Interpretation of *Is 7. In: Th. L. Markey, L. Repanšek (eds.), Revisiting Dispersions. Celtic and Germanic ca. 400 BC – ca. 400 AD. Proceedings of the International Interdisciplinary Conference held at Dolenjski muzej, Novo mesto, Slovenia; October 12 th – 14th, 2018 (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 67). Washington D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man, pp. 162–183.
