*Is 6: Difference between revisions

From Cives
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Inscription
{{Inscription
|trasnliteration=i.ḅ or ḅ.i
|trasnliteration=i.ḅ or ḅ.i
|object=bronze sheet
|object=bronze plaque
|script=Venetic alphabet
|script=Venetic alphabet
|language=Venetic
|language=Venetic
Line 10: Line 10:
|context=open-air cult site
|context=open-air cult site
|date=1st c. BC
|date=1st c. BC
|commentary=<p>Two characters can be seen on the fragment. The reading is difficult, and the writing direction cannot be determined. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations. Most likely there are two letters from a Venetian alphabet, which are accompanied by one or two hyphenators. It remains unclear whether the character on the right should be read as an incomplete 'b' or as an incomplete 'o' with "internal" syllable punctuation. It is not possible to decide which of the four alternatives – ‹b.i› or ‹i.b›, ‹.ọ.i› or ‹i.ọ.› – is correct. It is probably a (small) part of a votive text; such inscriptions are on a whole series of bronze sheets attached.</p>
|commentary=<p>Two characters can be seen on the fragment. The reading is difficult, and the writing direction cannot be determined. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations. Most likely there are two letters from a Venetic alphabet, which are accompanied by one or two hyphenators. It remains unclear whether the character on the right should be read as an incomplete 'b' or as an incomplete 'o' with "internal" syllabic punctuation. It is not possible to decide which of the four alternatives – ‹b.i› or ‹i.b›, ‹.ọ.i› or ‹i.ọ.› – is correct. It is probably a (small) part of a votive text; such inscriptions are on a whole series of bronze sheets attached.</p>
|bibliography=<p>Repanšek L. (2022). Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615Eichner H., Nedoma R. (2009), Neue vorrömische Inschriften aus Westslowenien: epigraphische und linguistische Evidenz. – V: G. Tiefengraber, B. Kavur, A. Gaspari (ur.), Montagnac: éditions monique mergoil. Keltske študije II. Studies in Celtic Archaeology. Papers in honour of Mitja Guštin, Protohistoire Européenne 11, pp. 65–75</p><p>Božič D., Istenič J., Osmuk N., Šmit Ž., Turk P. (2009). New Pre-Roman Inscriptions from Western Slovenia : The Archaeological Evidence. Montagnac: éditions monique mergoil. Keltske študije II, studies in celtic archaeology, papers in honour of Mitja Guštin, Protohistoire Européenne 11 pp. 48-62.</p><p>Mlinar M, Tecco Hvala S. (2022), Poselitvena slika posoške/svetolucijske skupine –</p><p>nova najdišča in spoznanja / Settlement in the Posočje/Sveta Lucija group –</p><p>new sites and insights, Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 397-469</p><p><br></p>
|bibliography=<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Repanšek, Luka (2022)</span>. Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds.&nbsp;''Arheološki vestnik''&nbsp;73, pp. 601–615</p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Mlinar, Miha & Tecco Hvala, Snežana (2022)</span>. Poselitvena slika posoške/svetolucijske skupine – nova najdišča in spoznanja / Settlement in the Posočje/Sveta Lucija group – new sites and insights.&nbsp;''Arheološki vestnik''&nbsp;73, pp. 397-469.</p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Laharnar, Boštjan & Turk, Peter (2018)</span>.&nbsp;''Železnodobne zgodbe s stičišča svetov''. Ljubljana: Narodni muzej Slovenije, p. 141.</p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Eichner, Heiner & Nedoma, Robert (2009)</span>. Neue vorrömische Inschriften aus Westslowenien: epigraphische und linguistische Evidenz. – In: G. Tiefengraber, B. Kavur, A. Gaspari (eds.),&nbsp;''Keltske študije II. Studies in Celtic Archaeology. Papers in honour of Mitja Guštin'', Protohistoire Européenne 11. Montagnac: Éditions Monique Mergoil,&nbsp; pp. 65–75.</p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(230, 126, 35);">Božič, Dragan, Istenič Janka, Osmuk Nada, Šmit Žiga & Turk Peter (2009)</span>. New Pre-Roman Inscriptions from Western Slovenia: The Archaeological Evidence. In: G. Tiefengraber, B. Kavur, A. Gaspari (eds.),&nbsp;''Keltske študije II, studies in celtic archaeology, papers in honour of Mitja Guštin'', Protohistoire Européenne 11. Montagnac: Éditions Monique Mergoil, pp. 48-62.</p>
|file=Gradič nad Kobaridom.jpg
|imageCaption=Drawing: Ida Murgelj © Narodni muzej Slovenije / National Museum of Slovenia
|test=<div id="slikce"><img id="i" src="venetianLetters/i.png"><img id="int1" src="venetianLetters/int1.png"><img id="o3" src="venetianLetters/o3.png"></div>
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 13:02, 8 May 2024

Transliteration i.ḅ or ḅ.i
Object bronze plaque
Script Venetic alphabet
Language Venetic
Writing direction ambiguous
Technique embossed
Condition fragmentary
Findspot Gradič above Kobarid
Archaeological context open-air cult site
Archaeological culture to be inserted
Date 1st c. BC

Original text

<img id="i" src="venetianLetters/i.png"><img id="int1" src="venetianLetters/int1.png"><img id="o3" src="venetianLetters/o3.png">


Commentary

Two characters can be seen on the fragment. The reading is difficult, and the writing direction cannot be determined. *Is 6 and *Is 8 are too short to afford any useful insights into the question of their provenance – they could, theoretically, be pure infiltrations. Most likely there are two letters from a Venetic alphabet, which are accompanied by one or two hyphenators. It remains unclear whether the character on the right should be read as an incomplete 'b' or as an incomplete 'o' with "internal" syllabic punctuation. It is not possible to decide which of the four alternatives – ‹b.i› or ‹i.b›, ‹.ọ.i› or ‹i.ọ.› – is correct. It is probably a (small) part of a votive text; such inscriptions are on a whole series of bronze sheets attached.

Bibliography

Repanšek, Luka (2022). Posoškovenetski areal v luči novejših epigrafskih najdb / Isonzian Venetic inscriptions in the light of recent finds. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 601–615

Mlinar, Miha & Tecco Hvala, Snežana (2022). Poselitvena slika posoške/svetolucijske skupine – nova najdišča in spoznanja / Settlement in the Posočje/Sveta Lucija group – new sites and insights. Arheološki vestnik 73, pp. 397-469.

Laharnar, Boštjan & Turk, Peter (2018)Železnodobne zgodbe s stičišča svetov. Ljubljana: Narodni muzej Slovenije, p. 141.

Eichner, Heiner & Nedoma, Robert (2009). Neue vorrömische Inschriften aus Westslowenien: epigraphische und linguistische Evidenz. – In: G. Tiefengraber, B. Kavur, A. Gaspari (eds.), Keltske študije II. Studies in Celtic Archaeology. Papers in honour of Mitja Guštin, Protohistoire Européenne 11. Montagnac: Éditions Monique Mergoil,  pp. 65–75.

Božič, Dragan, Istenič Janka, Osmuk Nada, Šmit Žiga & Turk Peter (2009). New Pre-Roman Inscriptions from Western Slovenia: The Archaeological Evidence. In: G. Tiefengraber, B. Kavur, A. Gaspari (eds.), Keltske študije II, studies in celtic archaeology, papers in honour of Mitja Guštin, Protohistoire Européenne 11. Montagnac: Éditions Monique Mergoil, pp. 48-62.

Image

Drawing: Ida Murgelj © Narodni muzej Slovenije / National Museum of Slovenia